dimension reduction
- North America > United States > California > Alameda County > Berkeley (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- North America > United States > Arizona > Maricopa County > Phoenix (0.04)
- (22 more...)
- Asia > Middle East > UAE > Abu Dhabi Emirate > Abu Dhabi (0.14)
- Europe > Netherlands > South Holland > Leiden (0.05)
- North America > United States > California (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Suffolk County > Boston (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Denmark (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Oceania > New Zealand (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Energy (0.69)
- Government > Regional Government > North America Government > United States Government (0.68)
- North America > United States > Wisconsin > Dane County > Madison (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Performance Analysis > Accuracy (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.47)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > West Lafayette (0.04)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > Lafayette (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.46)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.46)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.04)
- North America > United States > Wisconsin (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
Dimension-reduced outcome-weighted learning for estimating individualized treatment regimes in observational studies
Son, Sungtaek, Lila, Eardi, Chan, Kwun Chuen Gary
Individualized treatment regimes (ITRs) aim to improve clinical outcomes by assigning treatment based on patient-specific characteristics. However, existing methods often struggle with high-dimensional covariates, limiting accuracy, interpretability, and real-world applicability. We propose a novel sufficient dimension reduction approach that directly targets the contrast between potential outcomes and identifies a low-dimensional subspace of the covariates capturing treatment effect heterogeneity. This reduced representation enables more accurate estimation of optimal ITRs through outcome-weighted learning. To accommodate observational data, our method incorporates kernel-based covariate balancing, allowing treatment assignment to depend on the full covariate set and avoiding the restrictive assumption that the subspace sufficient for modeling heterogeneous treatment effects is also sufficient for confounding adjustment. We show that the proposed method achieves universal consistency, i.e., its risk converges to the Bayes risk, under mild regularity conditions. We demonstrate its finite sample performance through simulations and an analysis of intensive care unit sepsis patient data to determine who should receive transthoracic echocardiography.
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.14)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- (2 more...)
A Probabilistic Graph Coupling View of Dimension Reduction
Most popular dimension reduction (DR) methods like t-SNE and UMAP are based on minimizing a cost between input and latent pairwise similarities. Though widely used, these approaches lack clear probabilistic foundations to enable a full understanding of their properties and limitations. To that extent, we introduce a unifying statistical framework based on the coupling of hidden graphs using cross entropy. These graphs induce a Markov random field dependency structure among the observations in both input and latent spaces. We show that existing pairwise similarity DR methods can be retrieved from our framework with particular choices of priors for the graphs. Moreover this reveals that these methods relying on shift-invariant kernels suffer from a statistical degeneracy that explains poor performances in conserving coarse-grain dependencies. New links are drawn with PCA which appears as a non-degenerate graph coupling model.